होम
Precambrian Research New material of the biomineralizing tubular fossil Sinotubulites from the late Ediacaran Dengying...
New material of the biomineralizing tubular fossil Sinotubulites from the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation, South China
Cai, Yaoping, Xiao, Shuhai, Hua, Hong, Yuan, Xunlaiयह पुस्तक आपको कितनी अच्छी लगी?
फ़ाइल की गुणवत्ता क्या है?
पुस्तक की गुणवत्ता का मूल्यांकन करने के लिए यह पुस्तक डाउनलोड करें
डाउनलोड की गई फ़ाइलों की गुणवत्ता क्या है?
खंड:
261
भाषा:
english
पत्रिका:
Precambrian Research
DOI:
10.1016/j.precamres.2015.02.002
Date:
May, 2015
फ़ाइल:
PDF, 607 KB
आपके टैग:
फ़ाइल 1-5 मिनट के भीतर आपके ईमेल पते पर भेजी जाएगी.
फ़ाइल 1-5 मिनट के भीतर आपकी Kindle पर डिलीवर हो जाएगी.
टिप्पणी: आप जो भी पुस्तक अपने Kindle पर भेजना चाहें इसे सत्यापित करना होगा. Amazon Kindle Support से सत्यापन ईमेल के लिए अपना मेलबॉक्स देखें.
टिप्पणी: आप जो भी पुस्तक अपने Kindle पर भेजना चाहें इसे सत्यापित करना होगा. Amazon Kindle Support से सत्यापन ईमेल के लिए अपना मेलबॉक्स देखें.
Conversion to is in progress
Conversion to is failed
0 comments
आप पुस्तक समीक्षा लिख सकते हैं और अपना अनुभव साझा कर सकते हैं. पढ़ूी हुई पुस्तकों के बारे में आपकी राय जानने में अन्य पाठकों को दिलचस्पी होगी. भले ही आपको किताब पसंद हो या न हो, अगर आप इसके बारे में ईमानदारी से और विस्तार से बताएँगे, तो लोग अपने लिए नई रुचिकर पुस्तकें खोज पाएँगे.
1
|
|
2
|
|
Accepted Manuscript Title: New material of the biomineralizing tubular fossil Sinotubulites from the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation, South China Author: Yaoping Cai Shuhai Xiao Hong Hua Xunlai Yuan PII: DOI: Reference: S0301-9268(15)00043-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2015.02.002 PRECAM 4191 To appear in: Precambrian Research Received date: Revised date: Accepted date: 1-11-2014 3-1-2015 4-2-2015 Please cite this article as: Cai, Y., Xiao, S., Hua, H., Yuan, X.,New material of the biomineralizing tubular fossil Sinotubulites from the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation, South China, Precambrian Research (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.02.002 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights Description of three new species of the biomineralizing animal Sinotubulites Detailed illustration of tube morphology and microstrutures of Sinotubulites Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Systematic re-evaluation of all published Sinotubulites fossils 1 Page 1 of 46 New material of the biomineralizing tubular fossil Sinotubulites from the late Ediacaran Dengying Formation, South China State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest us a cr ip t Yaoping Caia,b,*, Shuhai Xiaoc,*, Hong Huaa, Xunlai Yuanb University, Xian 710069, China State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of an b Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA M c Ac ce p te d *Corresponding author:; yaopingcai@nwu.edu.cn (Y. Cai); xiao@vt.edu (S. Xiao). Abstract Sinotubulites is a late Ediacaran biomineralizing tubular fossil with a probable animal affinity. It is characterized by millimeter- to centimeter-sized and multi-layered tubes open at both ends. The tube consists of two morphologically different walls: a multi-layered inner wall with weak ornamentations and a multi-layered outer wall with transverse or oblique corrugations and sometimes longitudinal ridges. The majority of previously published Sinotubulites species are considered as synonymous with the type 2 Page 2 of 46 species: S. baimatuoensis. Three new species—S. triangularis n. sp., S. pentacarinalis n. sp., and S. hexagonus n. sp.—are reported from the late ip t Ediacaran Beiwan Member of the Dengying Formation in southern Shaanxi Province, South China. The three new species are similar to the type species in cr having nested, multilayered inner and outer tube walls. However, they are us different in their polygonal cross sections and longitudinal ridges. S. baimatuoensis is more or less circular in cross section and lack longitudinal an ridges on the outer tube wall, whereas S. triangularis, S. pentacarinalis, and S. hexagonus are respectively triangular, pentagonal, and hexagonal in cross section M with three, five, and six longitudinal ridges on the exterior surface of the outer wall. The new material adds to the diversity of late Ediacaran biomineralizing te d animals. The triradial, pentaradial, and hexaradial tubes of S. triangularis, S. pentacarinalis, and S. hexagonus share some intriguing similarities in body Ac ce p symmetry with some early Cambrian tubular fossils, although these Cambrian tubes are not open at both ends. Still, it would be interesting to explore the tantalizing possibility of evolutionary continuity of triradial, pentaradial, and hexaradial tubular animals across the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. Keywords: Ediacaran, Dengying Formation, Sinotubulites, biomineralization, South China. 1. Introduction 3 Page 3 of 46 Animal biomineralization represents one of the most important evolutionary innovations that fundamentally transformed the ecology of the biosphere and ip t elemental cycles of the Earth systems. Paleontological investigation of this evolutionary event has been focused on early Cambrian small shelly fossils (Bengtson cr et al., 1990), although animal biomineralization probably had its evolutionary root in us the Ediacaran Period (Wood, 2011; Penny et al., 2014). Several biomineralizing fossils of probable animal affinities have been reported from late Ediacaran carbonate an rocks, including Cloudina (Germs, 1972), Namacalathus (Grotzinger et al., 2000), Namapoikia (Wood et al., 2002), and Sinotubulites (Chen et al., 1981). Among these M Ediacaran skeletal fossils, Cloudina has the widest geographic range and its morphologies have been well characterized primarily based on three-dimensionally te d phosphatized material from China (Hua et al., 2005b; Cai et al., 2014; Cortijo et al., 2014) and silicified material from Spain (Cortijo et al., 2010). Other taxa, however, Ac ce p have not been very well studied, partly due to poor fossil preservation and limited occurrences. In this paper, we provide a thorough morphological description and systematic treatment of the genus Sinotubulites, based on material from the late Ediacaran Beiwan Member of the Dengying Formation in southern Shaanxi Province, South China. The Beiwan fossils are phosphatized (Zhang et al., 1992; Chen and Sun, 2001; Chen et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2012), and together with silicified material from the upper Dengying Formation in the Yangtze Gorges area (Chen and Wang, 1977; Chen et al., 1981) they offer an excellent opportunity to characterize the three-dimensional 4 Page 4 of 46 morphology of this genus. Our investigation adds more morphological details to the type species Sinotubulites baimatuoensis and also recovers three new species—S. ip t triangularis, S. pentacarinalis, and S. hexagonus. In addition to its occurrence in South China (Chen et al., 1981; Chen and Sun, cr 2001; Chen et al., 2008), Sinotubulites has also been reported from Ediacaran us successions in Mexico (McMenamin, 1985), California and Nevada (Signor et al., 1983; Signor et al., 1987), and possibly Spain (Zhuravlev et al., 2012); a systematic an study of these previously published species of Sinotubulites is long overdue. Armed with a better understanding of the morphological variation of Sinotubulites based on M three-dimensionally phosphatized material from China, we can now more thoroughly te Mexico, Nevada, and Spain. d evaluate the occurrence of Sinotubulites species from Ediacaran successions in Ac ce p 2. Stratigraphic setting The fossil locality (Lijiagou section; see Cai et al. 2014 for location) is located in the northwestern margin of Yangtze Platform, ca. 20 km north to the city of Ningqiang. The Ediacaran System in the Ningqiang area consists of the Doushantuo Formation and the overlying Dengying Formation, which is overlain by the lower Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Formation (Fig. 1). The Doushantuo Formation can be completely observed only at a few sections in the Ningqiang area and typically consists of, in ascending order, slate, sandstone–conglomerate, and carbonate sequences. The overlying Dengying Formation in the Ningqiang area is dominated by medium- to 5 Page 5 of 46 thick-bedded dolostone and varies remarkably in thickness, ranging from only 24 m to as much as 975 m (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Shaanxi Province, ip t 1989). It can be sub-divided into three members (Zhang, 1986)—the lower Algal Dolomite and the upper Beiwan members are both characterized by medium- to cr thick-bedded peritidal dolostone, whereas the middle Gaojiashan Member is typically us composed of interbedded fine-grained siliciclastic and carbonate rocks containing a diverse fossil assemblage of the Gaojiashan Lagerstätte (Cai et al., 2010; Schiffbauer an et al., 2014). The Beiwan Member of the Dengying Formation is unconformably overlain by the basal Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Formation (limestone, chert, and M phosphorite rich in small shelly fossils) where the earliest known priapulid-like animal Eopriapulites sphinx has been reported (Liu et al., 2014). The Dengying te d Formation in the Ningqiang area is estimated to be 551–541 Ma by correlation with Ac ce p the Yangtze Gorges area where it has been dated (Condon et al., 2005). 3. Material and methods All fossils reported here were recovered from dolostone of the Beiwan Member of the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section (Fig. 1), except for the neotype specimen which is from the Baimatuo Member of the Dengying Formation at the Baishatuo section (Yangtze Gorges area, western Hubei Province). The topmost ca. 10 m of the Beiwan Member has yielded three-dimensionally phosphatized microfossils including Sinotubulites, Cloudina, protolagenids, and other problematic forms (Bengtson and Yue, 1992; Zhang et al., 1992; Chen and Sun, 2001; Hua et al., 2005a; 6 Page 6 of 46 Chen et al., 2008). In this study, over 100 Sinotubulites specimens have been extracted, using standard acetic acid maceration technique (5–8 % acetic acid), from samples ip t collected at 0.2–7 m below the Beiwan–Kuanchuanpu boundary. Extracted specimens were examined on a FEI Quanta 600 field-emission scanning electron microscope. cr Descriptive terms employed here are modified from Sun et al. (2012) and illustrated us in Fig. 2. All fossils illustrated in this paper are reposited in the Department of an Geology, Northwest University (GEONWU), Xi’an, China. M 4. Systematic paleontology Phylum, Class, Order, Family uncertain te d Genus Sinotubulites Chen, Chen and Qian, 1981, emended Ac ce p Type species: Sinotubulites baimatuoensis Chen, Chen and Qian, 1981. Synonyms: Cloudina? sp. Chen and Wang, 1977, p. 220. Qinella Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992, p. 94–98. Qinella Hua et al., 2000b, p. 383 (junior homonym of Qinella Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992). Emended diagnosis: Straight or slightly curved tubes with both ends open. Tube can be cylindrical (circular in cross section) or prismatic (triangular, pentagonal, and 7 Page 7 of 46 hexagonal in cross section), consisting of a transversely corrugated outer wall and a more or less smooth inner wall, both multiple-layered. Longitudinal ridges may be ip t present on the outer wall. Discussion: Tubular fossils from the Dengying Formation were initially reported cr in Chen and Wang (1977) as Cloudina? sp. These fossils were subsequently described us as Sinotubulites Chen, Chen, and Qian, 1981, with its only constituent species, S. baimatuoensis Chen, Chen, and Qian, 1981. Thus, although no type species was an explicitly designated in the original publication (Chen et al., 1981), S. baimatuoensis becomes the type species by monotypy. M Sinotubulites was originally diagnosed as a straight or curved, thick hollow tube, with the exterior surface smooth or ornamented with transverse annulations or ridges. te d In cross sectional views, outer rim (outer wall) circular or irregularly polygonal, whereas inner rim (inner wall) circular. Inner rim (inner wall) centrally or Ac ce p eccentrically located (Chen et al., 1981). This diagnosis was subsequently emended (McMenamin, 1985) to accommodate new observations that the tube sometimes tapers, irregular ornaments such as ribs, striae, bands, and annular depressions may be obliquely or transversely oriented, and annular ornamentation may be connected with or cross-cut by longitudinal ridges. Chen and Sun (2001) further emended the diagnosis to emphasize that the hollow tube is multilayered and open at both ends with a “tube-in-tube” construction. The diagnosis is here again emended to accommodate the three new species, S. triangularis, S. pentacarinalis, S. hexagonus, which is characterized by prismatic tubes with three, five, or six longitudinal ridges, 8 Page 8 of 46 thus resulting in a triangular, pentagonal, or hexagonal cross-section. Sinotubulites is differentiated from other Ediacaran and Cambrian tubular fossils ip t by its “tube-in-tube” construction, transversely corrugated outer tube walls, and the presence of longitudinal ridges in some species. The late Ediacaran fossil Cloudina is cr also characterized by multiple-layered tube walls, but it is conotubular in shape with a us closed apex and its tube consists of nested funnels rather than nested tubes (Hua et al., 2005b). Cloudina carinata Cortijo, Martí Mus, Jensen, and Palacios, 2010 is an characterized by longitudinal ridges and thus similar to S. triangularis, S. pentacarinalis, and S. hexagonus described here. Indeed, the similarity between M Cloudina carinata and Sinotubulites has been noted previously (Cortijo et al., 2010). However, well-preserved Cloudina carinata specimens have the characteristic te d funnel-in-funnel construction and they tend to have seven or more longitudinal ridges (Cortijo et al., 2010), although some specimens have only six longitudinal ridges Ac ce p (Iván Cortijo, personal communication). In addition, some specimens illustrated as Cloudina waldei (e.g., pl. 1, figs. 1–2 of Hahn and Pflug, 1985) have wrinkled tube walls and are somewhat similar to Sinotubulites baimatuoensis, although a detailed restudy of the C. waldei material is needed before any definitive conclusion is made. Qinella Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992 was originally diagnosed as a multilayered tubular fossil with tube-in-tube construction, a feature used to distinguish it from Sinotubulites (Ding et al., 1992). However, it was later shown that well-preserved Sinotubulites tubes from the type locality in the Yangtze Gorges area have multilayered walls, and the two genera are considered synonymous (Chen and 9 Page 9 of 46 Sun, 2001). Hua et al. (2000b) also synonymized Qinella (and its type species, Q. shaanxiensis Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992) with Sinotubulites, but they ip t chose to retain the genus Qinella and designated Q. levis Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992 as its type species. Essentially, Hua et al. (2000b) created a junior cr homonym. As discussed under the species Sinotubulites baimatuoensis, both Q. us shaanxiensis and Q. levis are considered junior synonyms of S. baimatuoensis. As an such, both hononyms of Qinella are synonymous with Sinotubulites. Sinotubulites baimatuoensis Chen, Chen and Qian, 1981, emended M (Figures 3–4) te d Synonyms: Cloudina? sp. Chen and Wang, 1977, p. 220, fig. 1a, b. Ac ce p Sinotubulites baimatuoensis Chen et al., 1981, p. 119–120, pl. I, fig. 1, 2; pl. II, fig. 1–6. Skolithos miaoheensis Chen et al., 1981, p. 117–118, pl. I, fig. 4–5. Multiple-walled tubular fossil, Signor et al., 1983, fig. 3e. Smooth, single-walled shell, Signor et al., 1983, fig. 3f. Irregularly annulated tube, Signor et al., 1983, fig. 3g. Regularly annulated tube, Signor et al., 1983, fig. 3h. Sinotubulites cienegensis McMenamin, 1985, p. 1416–1421, figs. 3.2–3.6, 4.1, 4.2, 4.4–4.7, 5.2, 5.5, 5.6. 10 Page 10 of 46 Sinotubulites baimatuoensis McMenamin, 1985, p. 1416–1421, fig. 6. Sinotubulites cienegensis Signor et al., 1987, p. 431–432, fig. 5.1. ip t Qinella shaanxiensis Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992, p. 94–96, pl. VII, fig. 1–5, 8–10; pl. IX, fig. 5, 7, 10. cr Qinella levis Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992, p. 96, pl. VII, fig. 6. us Qinella lijiagouensis Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992, p. 96–97, pl. VII, fig. 7. an Qinella cf. lijiagouensis Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992, p. 97–98, pl. XIV, fig. 6a–c. M ?Qinella sp. Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al., 1992, p. 98, pl. XIV, fig. 4. Sinotubulites baimatuoensis Li et al. in Ding et al., 1992, p. 98–99, pl. XVI, fig. 1. te d Sinotubulites miaoheensis Ding et al., 1993, p. 120–121, pl. II, fig. 1–6. Sinotubulites cienegensis Hua et al., 2000a, pl. I, fig. 1b (partim; not pl. II, fig. 6). Ac ce p Qinella levis Hua et al., 2000b , p. 383, pl. I, fig. 3, 4, 9–12 (partim; not pl. I, fig. 1). Sinotubulites cienegensis Hua et al., 2000b, p. 381–383, pl. I, fig. 5–8; pl. II, fig. 1–5, 6a, b, 14. Sinotubulites shaanxiensis Chen and Sun, 2001, p. 188-189, pl. III, fig. 7 (but not fig. 6); pl. IV, fig. 1, 2 (but not fig. 3). Sinotubulites cienegensis Hua et al., 2003, fig. 2A–C. Sinotubulites Hua et al., 2007, pl. V, fig. 7, 8. Sinotubulites baimatuoensis Chen et al., 2008, fig. 2E. Sinotubulites Chen et al., 2008, figs. 2A, 3A–E, 3G, 4A–C (but not figs. 2B–C, 3F). 11 Page 11 of 46 Sinotubulites baimatuoensis Cai et al., 2010, fig. 4N. Sinotubulites sp. Zhuravlev et al., 2012, fig. 5. ip t Sinotubulites Sun et al., 2012, figs. 3C–D, 3G–I, 4 (but not fig. 3A–B, 3E–F). cr Neotype: A silicified specimen from the Dengying Formation in the Yangtze us Gorges area, where the original material of Sinotubulites baimatuoensis was collected (Chen and Wang, 1977; Chen et al., 1981), is here designated as a neotype. The an specimen is illustrated in Fig. 3 and reposited at Northwest University (Museum catalog number: GEONWU-BST-006). M Emended diagnosis: A species of Sinotubulites with a cylindrical tube consisting te corrugated outer wall. d of a weakly ornamented inner wall (circular in cross section) and a strongly Description: The great majority of Lijiagou specimens are phosphatized, although Ac ce p some are silicified (Chen et al., 2008). Specimens are incompletely preserved (Figs. 3 and 4), ranging from 3 to 28 mm in length and 1.5–6 mm in diameter. Both the inner and outer walls are multilayered: layers in inner wall 0.025–0.055 mm in thickness and 0.010–0.050 mm in spacing, whereas layers in outer wall 0.040–0.095 mm in thickness and 0.020–0.250 mm in spacing. The outer wall is ornamented with transverse corrugations (Figs. 2A, 3A–C, 4A, B and D), although some corrugations can be oblique (Fig. 4D). Corrugations can be densely or sparsely arranged (Fig. 4A), and they can be strongly folded (Fig. 4B). The outer wall can be circular (Fig. 4C) or slightly polygonal in cross-sectional view (Fig. 3D), partly due to diagenetic 12 Page 12 of 46 deformation. The transition from corrugated outer wall to smooth inner wall can be gradational (Chen et al., 2008) or abrupt (Fig. 4E). The inner wall is often circular in ip t cross section (Fig. 4C), and it is nearly smooth with only faint transverse annulations (Fig. 4E). The total number of shell layers in both the outer and inner walls can be cr more than 10 (Fig. 4E) and up to 16. us Occurrence: Deep Spring Formation, Mount Dunfee, Nevada, USA; Dengying Formation, Hubei Province, South China; Dengying Formation, Shaanxi Province, an South China; La Ciénega Formation, Sonora, Mexico; Ibor Group, Spain. Discussion: Chen et al. (1981) illustrated a number of specimens of S. M baimatuoensis, but they did not designate a holotype. Unfortunately we cannot relocate the original material to select a lectotype. Thus, the specimen illustrated in te d Fig. 3 is here designated as a neotype. Although the original composition of Sinotubulites tubes is inferred to have been Ac ce p calcareous (Chen et al., 1981; McMenamin, 1985) or aragonitic (Chen et al., 2008), Sinotubulites can be preserved through different secondary mineralization processes, including calcification (McMenamin, 1985; Signor et al., 1987), silicification (Chen et al., 1981; Chen et al., 2008), phosphatization (Chen et al., 2008), and dolomitization (Chen et al., 1981). These variable taphonomic pathways partly account for the different morphologies among different Sinotubulites populations. Previous morphological description and systematic treatment of Sinotubulites has been primarily focused on the morphology of the outer wall (Chen and Wang, 1977; Chen et al., 1981; McMenamin, 1985; Signor et al., 1987; Li et al., 1992; Zhang et al., 13 Page 13 of 46 1992; Hua et al., 2000b; Chen and Sun, 2001; Chen et al., 2008). However, our material shows that the external appearance of Sinotubulites is quite variable (Fig. 4A, ip t B and D), depending on how strong the corrugations are. Recognizing this variability as intraspecific variation, we regard Qinella shaanxiensis Zhang et al. in Ding et al., cr 1992, Q. levis Zhang et al. in Ding et al., 1992, Q. lijiagouensis Zhang et al. in Ding et us al., 1992, and Sinotubulites cienegensis McMenamin, 1985, as junior synonyms of Sinotubulites baimatuoensis. an The genus Qinella was established by Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding et al. (1992), with Q. shaanxiensis as the type species and Q. lijiagouensis and Q. levis as two M additional species. It shares strong morphological similarities with Sinotubulites (Hua et al., 2000b; Chen and Sun, 2001), including the signature “tube-in-tube” te d construction and the development of transverse corrugations. Thus, Hua et al. (2000b) synonymized Qinella shaanxiensis and Q. lijiagouensis with Sinotubulites cienegensis Ac ce p because all three species are characterized with transverse corrugations that are developed to different degrees. Because Qinella shaanxiensis is the type species of Qinella, Hua et al.’s (2000b) synonymization implies that Qinella is a junior synonym of Sinotubulites, as they indicated in the synonym list under Sinotubulites. However, Hua et al. (2000b) chose to retain the genus Qinella and designated Q. levis as its type species, arguing that Q. levis is different from Sinotubulites in having a “tube-in-tube” construction but with smooth or weakly ornamented tube walls. Essentially, Hua et al. (2000b) created a junior homonym Qinella Hua, Zhang, Zhang, and Wang, 2000, which is defined by a different type species than Qinella Zhang, Li, and Dong in Ding 14 Page 14 of 46 et al. (1992). Subsequently, Chen and Sun (2001) recognized the tube-in-tube construction as a basic feature of Sinotubulites and transferred both Qinella ip t shaanxiensis and Q. levis to Sinotubulites to become S. shaanxiensis and S. levis. Chen and Sun (2001) also considered Q. lijiagouensis as stronlgy weathered variant of cr S. shaanxiensis, with its subdued corrugations resulting from the secondary loss of the us outermost layers of the outer tube wall. This secondary loss argument can also be applied to explain the weakly ornamented or smooth tube wall of S. levis. In other an words, the weakly ornamented or smooth tube wall of S. levis may represent only the inner wall, with the outer wall lost due to taphonomy or weathering. Thus, both Q. M lijiagouensis and S. levis are regarded as taphonomic variants of S. shaanxiensis. We further propose that S. shaanxiensis (along with Q. lijiagouensis and S. levis) te d is a junior synonym of S. baimatuoensis. Sinotubulites baimatuoensis was established based on silificied material from the Dengying Formation in the Yangtze Gorgse area Ac ce p (Chen et al., 1981). The silicified material is poorly preserved and does not reveal as much detail about the multi-layered tube walls as the phosphatized material from southern Shaanxi. In a recent study, Chen et al. (2008) compared the phosphatized and silicified material of Sinotubulites and concluded that S. baimatuoensis is a poorly preserved form of S. shaanxiensis, and these two species are synonymous with S. baimatuoensis taking priority. Chen et al.’s (2008) systematic evaluation is followed in this paper. We also propose that S. cienegensis is a junior synonym of S. baimatuoensis. Sinotubulites cienegensis was established by McMenamin (1985) based on Mexican 15 Page 15 of 46 material. It differs from S. baimatuoensis in that the latter has more strongly obique and bifurcating annulae. However, new material of S. baimatuoensis from southern ip t Shaanxi shows that this species has a wide range of morphological variation that can accomodate S. cienegensis. For example, Sun et al. (2012) have shown that the cr transverse corrugations (=annulations of McMenamin, 1985) occur on the tube at us different densities (Fig. 4A). Where the corrugations are sparsely distributed, they tend to be more regularly arranged (i.e., without bifurcation) and have lower reliefs, an thus similar to S. cienegensis. The corrugations can be transversely or slightly obliquely oriented relative to tube length (Fig. 4D). Thus, the morphological range of M S. baimatuoensis from southern Shaanxi can accommodate that of S. cienegensis. Isolated specimens from Ediacaran successions in Brazil described as Cloudina te d waldei Hahn and Pflug, 1985 (e.g., paratypes illustrated in pl. 1, figs. 1–2 of Hahn and Pflug, 1985) are similar to Sinotubulites baimatuoensis in having transverse Ac ce p corrugations and a more or less circular cross section. According to Gaucher et al. (2003), C. waldei is a junior synonym of Cloudina lucianoi (Beurlen and Sommer, 1957) Zaine and Fairchild, 1985. However, most Cloudina specimens from Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay were observed in thin sections (Gaucher et al., 2003; Warren et al., 2011; Warren et al., 2013; Warren et al., 2014), and it is difficult to ascertain whether their tests are transversely corrugated and consist of nested tubes or funnels. More study of extracted specimens is needed to determine the relationship between C. waldei, C. lucianoi, and S. baimatuoensis. 16 Page 16 of 46 Sinotubulites triangularis n. sp. ip t Figures 5, 6 Etymology: Species epithet derived from Latin triangularis, with reference to the cr triangular prismatic morphology of the new species. us Holotype: Specimen illustrated in Fig. 5A, reposited at Northwest University (Museum catalog number: GEONWU-LJGTL-1-2013-002). an Additional material: There are sixteen specimens in our collection, seven of which are illustrated in Figs. 5–6. M Type locality and occurrence: Upper Ediacaran System, the uppermost Beiwan te Province, South China. d Member of the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section of Ningqiang, Shaanxi Diagnosis: A species of Sinotubulites with triangular prismatic tubular Ac ce p morphology. Description: The tube of S. triangularis n. sp. is a straight (Fig. 5B) or gently curved (Fig. 5A), prismatic with an equilateral triangular cross section (Figs. 5C and 6B), and consists of outer and inner walls, both multi-layered (Figs. 5D, 6B–F). Layers in the outer tube wall are 0.020–0.045 mm in thickness and 0.020–0.065 mm in spacing. Transverse corrugations in outer wall are regularly arranged, with their sharp crest spaced at 0.19–0.82 mm intervals. Straight or slightly helical longitudinal ridges in outer wall are zig-zag-shaped, reflecting the alternate offset of the corrugations on either side of the ridge (Fig. 5B). Layers in the inner wall are 17 Page 17 of 46 relatively smooth (Fig. 6A, D–F), 0.020–0.035 mm in thickness, and 0.010–0.025 mm in spacing. The longest tube in our collection is ca. 6.5 mm in length, with 18 ip t regularly spaced corrugations. Discussion: The new species differs from the type species in its triradially cr prismatic tube and its regularly arranged transverse corrugations that are offset at the us longitudinal ridges. Because there are multiple specimens of S. triangularis in our collection, it is unlikely that the triradial symmetry is a taphonomic artifact due to an compaction of round cylindrical tubes. Triradial symmetry is common among a number of Ediacaran and Cambrian M fossils (e.g., Fig. 7). Many Ediacaran discoidal fossils are triradially symmetrical, including Tribrachidium Glaessner in Glaessner and Daily, 1959 (a discoidal te d organism with three spiral, fringed arms), Albumares Fedonkin in Keller and Fedonkin, 1976 (a discoidal fossil with three lobes, each of which bearing radially Ac ce p directed, branching ridges), Anfesta Fedonkin, 1984 (similar to Albumares but more discoidal and less lobate in shape), Triforillonia Gehling, Narbonne, and Anderson, 2000 (a discoidal fossil with three lobes), Triactindiscus Zhao et al., 2010 (a discoidal fossil with three radiating carbonaceous traces), and Quasitriagondiscus Zhao et al., 2010 (a discoidal fossil with three carbonaceous traces forming triangle). However, these discoidal fossils do not have a tubular construction that is characteristic of Sinotubulites triangularis. More relevant to the tubular morphology of S. triangularis are several early Cambrian conotubular fossils with triradial symmetry. These include Anabarites trisulcatus Missarzhevsky in Voronova and Missarzhevsky, 1969 (Fig. 18 Page 18 of 46 7A–B), Anabarites trymatus Conway Morris and Bengtson in Bengtson et al., 1990, Emeiconularia trigemme Qian et al., 1997, and Emeiconularia amplicanalis Liu et al., ip t 2005 (Fig. 7C–D). These conotubular fossils have transverse ridges or wrinkles, and are characterized by three sides or lobes separated by three longitudinal sulci or cr internal keels (Qian and Bengtson, 1989; Qian et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2005). These us fossils invite the intriguing possibility that they may be phylogenetically related to S. triangularis, although we note the important difference that, at least for Anabarites, an the tubes are closed at the apical end. Nonetheless, it would be fruitful to explore whether these triradial tubular fossils are phylogenetically related, and if so they can M mutually illuminate each other to resolve their phylogenetic affinities and to te d understand the evolutionary continuity across the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary. Ac ce p Sinotubulites pentacarinalis n. sp. Figure 8 Synonyms: Qinella levis Hua et al., 2000a, pl. II, fig. 1. Qinella levis Hua et al., 2000b, p. 383, pl. I, fig. 1. Sinotubulites cienegensis Hua et al., 2000a, pl. II, fig. 6 (partim; not pl. I, fig. 1b). Sinotubulites shaanxiensis Chen and Sun, 2001, p. 188-189, pl. III, fig. 6 (but not fig. 7); pl. IV, fig. 3 (but not fig. 1, 2). Sinotubulites levis Chen and Sun, 2001, p. 189–190, pl. III, fig. 8. 19 Page 19 of 46 Sinotubulites Chen et al., 2008, fig. 2B–C, 3F. ip t Sinotubulites Sun et al., 2012, fig. 3A, 3E. Etymology: Species epithet derived from Greek penta- and Latin carinalis, with cr reference to the pentagonal cross section and the five ridges of the new species. us Holotype: Specimen illustrated in Fig. 8, reposited at Northwest University (Museum catalog number: GEONWU-LJG-2014-006). an Additional material: Seven additional specimens. Type locality and occurrence: Upper Ediacaran System, the uppermost Beiwan M Member of the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section of Ningqiang, Shaanxi Province, South China. morphology. te d Diagnosis: A species of Sinotubulites with pentagonal prismatic tubular Ac ce p Description: The tube of S. pentacarinalis n. sp. is straight or gently curved (Fig. 8A–B), and prismatic with a pentagonal cross section (Fig. 8C). Both inner and outer walls are multi-layered (Fig. 8C). Outer layers are 0.035–0.075 mm in thickness and 0.030–0.075 mm in spacing. Transverse corrugations in outer wall are regularly arranged, with their crest spaced at 0.12–1.8 mm intervals. Longitudinal ridges are helical and zig-zag-shaped due to the alternate offset of the corrugations on either side of the ridge (Fig. 8A–B). Inner layers are relatively smooth (Fig. 8A), 0.015–0.045 mm in thickness, and 0.015–0.035 mm in spacing. The longest tube in our collection is ca. 23 mm in length. 20 Page 20 of 46 Discussion: The new species differs from the type species in its pentagonal prismatic tube and five longitudinal ridges that divide the tube wall into five sides. ip t The helical longitudinal ridges and prismatic tube are not considered as taphonomic modification of a round cylindrical tube, because these features can be produced cr taphonomically only in the unlikely scenario of simultaneous twist and compaction. us A pentaradial symmetry is characteristic of several Ediacaran and early Cambrian taxa, including Olivooides Qian, 1977 (a tubular organism with a multiple an of five oral lobes, a test with five-fold symmetry, and a pentaradial apex), Arkarua Gehling, 1987 (a discoidal fossil with five radial ridges), and Pentaconularia M ningqiangensis Liu et al., 2011 (a tubular fossil consisting of five faces separated by five sulci). Of these taxa, Pentaconularia ningqiangensis (Liu et al., 2011) and te d Olivooides (Steiner et al., 2014) are tubular organisms and thus more similar to S. Ac ce p pentacarinalis than is Arkarua, although Olivooides has a closed apical end. Sinotubulites hexagonus n. sp. Figure 9 Synonyms: Sinotubulites Sun et al., 2012, fig. 3B, 3F. Etymology: Species epithet derived from Latin hexagonus, with reference to the hexagonal prismatic morphology of the new species. 21 Page 21 of 46 Holotype: Specimen illustrated in Fig. 9, reposited at Northwest University (Museum catalog number: GEONWU-LJG-2014-016). ip t Additional material: Twelve additional specimens. Type locality and occurrence: Upper Ediacaran System, the uppermost Beiwan cr Member of the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section of Ningqiang, Shaanxi us Province, South China. Diagnosis: A species of Sinotubulites with hexagonal prismatic tubular an morphology. Description: The tube of S. hexagonus n. sp. is nearly straight (Fig. 9A–C), and M prismatic with an equilateral hexagonal cross section (Fig. 9D–E). Both the outer and inner walls are multi-layered (Fig. 9D–E). Outer layers are 0.045–0.095 mm in te d thickness and 0.025–0.065 mm in spacing. The crests of transverse corrugations in outer wall are spaced at 0.16–3.1 mm intervals. Longitudinal ridges in outer wall are Ac ce p slightly helical and are zig-zag shaped due to the alternate offset of the corrugations on either side of the ridge (Fig. 9A–C). Layers in the inner wall are relatively smooth (Fig. 9D–E), 0.025–0.065 mm in thickness, and 0.020–0.040 mm in spacing. The longest tube in our collection is ca. 19 mm in length. Discussion: The new species differs from other Sinotubulites species in its hexagonal prismatic tube. Like in S. pentacarinalis, the helical longitudinal ridges and prismatic tube are probably biological rather than taphonomic features. Hexaradially symmetrical organisms are rare in the Ediacaran Period (Xiao and Laflamme, 2009), with the exception of Protechiurus edmondsi Glaessner, 1979 and 22 Page 22 of 46 Vendoconularia triradiata Ivantsov and Fedonkin, 2002. P. edmondsi is a spindle-shaped fossil with six longitudinal ridges, indicative of hexaradial symmetry ip t (Dzik, 2003). V. triradiata is a conical test with six faces, each consisting of two series of transverse structures, and it may be related to Paleozoic conulariids, thus cr suggestive of phylogenetic and evolutionary connections across the us Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary (Ivantsov and Fedonkin, 2002). Additionally, some specimens of Cloudina carinata have six longitudinal ridges (Iván Cortijo, personal an communication) and thus may be hexaradially symmetrical, but their tubular structures consist of nested funnels with outward projecting collars. In the Cambrian M Period, the conotubular fossil Anabarites sexalox Conway Morris and Bengtson in Bengtson et al., 1990 is well known for its hexaradial symmetry. In addition, the te d Cambrian fossil Hexaconularia sichuanensis He and Yang, 1986 has a six-sided test, but its test is flattened and the six sides are unequal in size, resulting in a biradial Ac ce p symmetry (Van Iten et al., 2010; Steiner et al., 2014). Moreover, V. triradiata, A. sexalox, and H. sichuanensis all have a closed apex, thus different from Sinotubulites hexagonus that is presumably open at both ends. 5. Conclusions New Sinotubulites material from the uppermost Beiwan Member of the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section in southern Shaanxi Province provides new morphological insights about this genus, confirming its tube-in-tube construction with multi-layered inner and outer tube walls. Three forms of the Lijiagou 23 Page 23 of 46 Sinotubulites fossils are characterized by prismatic tubes, two of which have helical longitudinal ridges. The prismatic tubes and helical longitudinal ridges are interpreted ip t as biological rather than taphonomic features. These forms are described as three new species, Sinotubulites triangularis, S. pentacarinalis, and S. hexagonus. The three new cr species are characterized by triradial, pentaradial, and hexaradial symmetries, adding us to the morphological diversity of biomineralizing tubular fossils in the Ediacaran Period. In light of the widespread occurrences of triradial, pentaradial, and hexaradial an tubular fossils in the Ediacaran and Cambrian periods, it would be interesting to explore whether these body symmetries have any phylogenetic significance or they te Acknowledgments d M arose repeatedly through convergence. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Ac ce p (41202006; 41030209; 41272011), National Science Foundation (EAR-1124062), State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics Research Project (BJ14263), Key Area Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Shaanxi Province (2012KCT-08), Talented Young Scientists Fund of Northwest University (PR14164), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M531410). We thank Drs. Yunhuan Liu and Xin Wang for providing microphotographs of early Cambrian small shelly fossils. Reviews by Iván Cortijo and an anonymous reviewer greatly improved the manuscript. 24 Page 24 of 46 References Bengtson, S., Morris, S.C., Cooper, B.J., Jell, P.A., Runnegar, B.N., 1990. Early ip t Cambrian fossils from South Australia. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 9, 1-364. cr Bengtson, S., Yue, Z., 1992. Predatorial borings in late Precambrian mineralized us exoskeletons. Science 257, 367-369. Beurlen, K., Sommer, F.W., 1957. Observações estratigráficas e paleontológicas sôbre an o calcário Corumbá. Boletim Divisão Geologia e Mineralogia/DNPM 168, 1-47. M Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Shaanxi Province, 1989. Regional Geology of Shaanxi Province. Chinese Ministry of Geology and Mineral te d Resources, Geological Memoirs, series 1, number 13. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 698 pp. Ac ce p Cai, Y., Hua, H., Xiao, S., Schiffbauer, J.D., Li, P., 2010. Biostratinomy of the late Ediacaran pyritized Gaojiashan Lagerstätte from southern Shaanxi, South China: Importance of event deposits. Palaios 25, 487-506. Cai, Y., Hua, H., Schiffbauer, J.D., Sun, B., Yuan, X., 2014. Tube growth patterns and microbial mat-related lifestyles in the Ediacaran fossil Cloudina, Gaojiashan Lagerstätte, South China. Gondwana Research 25, 1008-1018. Chen, M., Wang, Y., 1977. Note on the tubular metazoan fossils from the Dengying Formation of the upper Sinian System in the Gorge District of the Yangtze River. Kexue Tongbao (Chinese Science Bulletin) 22, 219-221. 25 Page 25 of 46 Chen, M., Chen, Y., Qian, Y., 1981. Some tubular fossils from Sinian-Lower Cambrian boundary sequences, Yangtze Gorge. Bulletin, Tianjin Institute of ip t Geology and Mineral Resources 3, 117-124. Chen, Z., Sun, W., 2001. Late Sinian (tubular) metazoan fossils: Cloudina and cr Sinotubulites from southern Shaanxi. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 18, us 180-202. Chen, Z., Bengtson, S., Zhou, C., Hua, H., Yue, Z., 2008. Tube structure and original an composition of Sinotubulites: shelly fossils from the late Neoproterozoic in southern Shaanxi, China. Lethaia 41, 37-45. M Condon, D., Zhu, M., Bowring, S., Wang, W., Yang, A., Jin, Y., 2005. U-Pb ages from the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation, China. Science 308, 95-98. te d Cortijo, I., Martí Mus, M., Jensen, S., Palacios, T., 2010. A new species of Cloudina from the terminal Ediacaran of Spain. Precambrian Research 176, 1-10. Ac ce p Cortijo, I., Cai, Y., Hua, H., Schiffbauer, J.D., Xiao, S., 2014. Life history and autecology of an Ediacaran index fossil: Development and dispersal of Cloudina. Gondwana Research DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2014.05.001. Ding, L., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Dong, J., 1992. The Study of the Late Sinian–Early Cambrian Biotas from the Northern Margin of the Yangtze Platform. Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House, Beijing, 135 pp. Ding, Q., Xing, Y., Wang, Z., Yin, C., Gao, L., 1993. Tubular and trace fossils from the Sinian Dengying Formation in the Miaohe-Liantuo area, Hubei Province. Geological Review 39, 118-123. 26 Page 26 of 46 Dzik, J., 2003. Anatomical information content in the Ediacaran fossils and their possible zoological affinities. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43, ip t 114-126. Fedonkin, M.A., 1984. Promorphology of the Vendian Radialia. In: Sokolov, B.S. and cr Iwanowski, A.B. (Editors), Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Earliest us Phanerozoic. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 30-58. Gaucher, C., Boggiani, P.C., Sprechmann, P., Sial, A.N., Fairchild, T., 2003. Integrated an correlation of the Vendian to Cambrian Arroyo del Soldado and Corumbá Groups (Uruguay and Brazil): palaeogeographic, palaeoclimatic and M palaeobiologic implications. Precambrian Research 120, 241-278. Gehling, J.G., 1987. Earliest known echinoderm - a new Ediacaran from the Pound te d Subgroup of South Australia. Alcheringa 11, 337-345. Gehling, J.G., Narbonne, G.M., Anderson, M.M., 2000. The first named Ediacaran Ac ce p body fossil, Aspidella terranovica. Palaeontology 43, 427-456. Germs, J.G.B., 1972. New shelly fossils from the Nama Group, South West Africa. American Journal of Science 272, 752-761. Glaessner, M.F., 1979. An echiurid worm from the Late Precambrian. Lethaia 12, 121-124. Glaessner, M.F., Daily, B., 1959. The geology and Late Precambrian fauna of the Ediacaran fossil reserve. Record of South Australia Museum 13, 369-401. Grotzinger, J.P., Watters, W.A., Knoll, A.H., 2000. Calcified metazoans in thrombolite-stromatolite reefs of the terminal Proterozoic Nama Group, 27 Page 27 of 46 Namibia. Paleobiology 26, 334-359. Hahn, G., Pflug, H.D., 1985. Polypenartige Organismen aus dem Jung-Praekambrium ip t (Nama-Gruppe) von Namibia. Polyp-like organisms from the upper Precambrian Nama Group of Namibia. Geologica et Palaeontologica 19, 1-13. cr He, Y., Yang, X., 1986. Early Cambrian coelenterates from Nanjiang, Sichuan. Academy of Geological Sciences 7, 31-43. us Bulletin of the Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resource, Chinese an Hua, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., 2000a. Fossil evidence of latest Neoproterozoic Gaojiashan biota and their characteristics. Acta M Palaeontologica Sinica 39, 507-515. Hua, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., 2000b. New fossil evidence from latest 39, 381-390. te d Neoproterozoic Gaojiashan biota, south Shaanxi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica Ac ce p Hua, H., Pratt, B.R., Zhang, L., 2003. Borings in Cloudina shells: Complex predator-prey dynamics in the terminal Neoproterozoic. Palaios 18, 454-459. Hua, H., Chen, Z., Zhang, L.Y., 2005a. Terminal Neoproterozoic tubular microproblematica from the Dengying Formation, Southern Shaanxi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 44, 487-493. Hua, H., Chen, Z., Yuan, X., Zhang, L., Xiao, S., 2005b. Skeletogenesis and asexual reproduction in the earliest biomineralizing animal Cloudina. Geology 33, 277-280. Hua, H., Chen, Z., Yuan, X., 2007. The advent of mineralized skeletons in 28 Page 28 of 46 Neoproterozoic Metazoa—new fossil evidence from the Gaojiashan Fauna. Geological Journal 42, 263-279. ip t Ivantsov, A.Y., Fedonkin, M.A., 2002. Conulariid-like fossil from the Vendian of Russia: a metazoan clade across the Proterozoic-Paleozoic boundary. cr Palaeontology 45, 1219-1229. us Keller, B.M., Fedonkin, M.A., 1976. New Records of Fos-sils in the Valdaian Group of the Precambrian on theSyuz'ma River. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, an Seriya Geologicheskaya 3, 38-44. Li, Y., Ding, L.F., Zhang, L.Y., Dong, J.S., Chen, H.X., 1992. Fossil descriptions. In: M Ding, L.F., Zhang, L., Li, Y. and Dong, J.S. (Editors), The Study of the Late Sinian–Early Cambrian Biotas from the Northern Margin of the Yangtze 80-112. te d Platform. Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House, Beijing, pp. Ac ce p Liu, Y., Li, Y., Shao, T., Wang, Y., Yu, B., Han, H., Yang, J., 2005. Two new species of Protoconulariids from the early Cambrian in South Shaanxi, China. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 22, 311-321. Liu, Y., Li, Y., Shao, T., Zheng, X., Wang, G., Wang, H., Wang, K., 2011. A new genus and species of protoconulariids from early Cambrian in the southern Shaanxi, China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 28, 244-249. Liu, Y., Xiao, S., Shao, T., Broce, J., Zhang, H., 2014. The oldest known priapulid-like scalidophoran animal and its implications for the early evolution of cycloneuralians and ecdysozoans. Evolution & Development 16, 155-165. 29 Page 29 of 46 McMenamin, M.A.S., 1985. Basal Cambrian small shelly fossils from the La Ciénega Formation, northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 59, ip t 1414-1425. Penny, A.M., Wood, R., Curtis, A., Bowyer, F., Tostevin, R., Hoffman, K.H., 2014. cr Ediacaran metazoan reefs from the Nama Group, Namibia. Science 344, us 1504-1506. Qian, Y., 1977. Hyolitha and some problematica from the Lower Cambrian an Meishucun Stage in central and southwestern China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 16, 255-275. M Qian, Y., Bengtson, S., 1989. Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the Early te Strata 24, 1-156. d Cambrian Meishucunian Stage in Yunnan Province, South China. Fossils and Qian, Y., Iten, H.V., Cox, R.S., Zhu, M., Zhuo, E., 1997. A brief account of Ac ce p Emeiconularia trigemme, a new genus and species of protoconulariid. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 14, 475-488. Schiffbauer, J.D., Xiao, S., Cai, Y., Wallace, A.F., Hua, H., Hunter, J., Xu, H., Peng, Y., Kaufman, A.J., 2014. A unifying model for Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic exceptional fossil preservation through pyritization and carbonaceous compression. Nature Communications 5, 5754 (doi: 10.1038/ncomms6754). Signor, P.W., McMenamin, M.A.S., Gevirtzman, D.A., Mount, J.F., 1983. Two new pre-trilobite faunas from western North America. Nature 303, 415-418. Signor, P.W., Mount, J.F., Onken, B.R., 1987. A pre-trilobite shelly fauna from the 30 Page 30 of 46 White-Inyo region of eastern California and western Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 61, 425-438. ip t Steiner, M., Qian, Y., Li, G., Hagadorn, J.W., Zhu, M., 2014. The developmental cycles of early Cambrian Olivooidae fam. nov. (?Cycloneuralia) from the cr Yangtze Platform (China). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, us Palaeoecology 398, 97-124. Sun, B., Hua, H., Cai, Y., 2012. Morphology and palaeoecology of the late Ediacaran an tubular fossil Sinotubulites. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 51, 107-113. Van Iten, H., Zhu, M., Li, G., 2010. Redescription of Hexaconularia He and Yang, M 1986 (lower Cambrian, South China): implications for the affinities of conulariid-like small shelly fossils. Palaeontology 53, 191-199. te d Voronova, L.G., Missarzhevsky, V.V., 1969. Finds of algae and worm tubes in the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary beds of the northern part of the Siberian Ac ce p Platform. Doklady AN SSSR 184, 207-210. Warren, L.V., Fairchild, T.R., Gaucher, C., Boggiani, P.C., Poiré, D.G., Anelli, L.E., Inchausti, J.C.G., 2011. Corumbella and in situ Cloudina in association with thrombolites in the Ediacaran Itapucumi Group, Paraguay. Terra Nova 23, 382-389. Warren, L.V., Simões, M.G., Fairchild, T.R., Riccomini, C., Gaucher, C., Anelli, L.E., Freitas, B.T., Boggiani, P.C., Quaglio, F., 2013. Origin and impact of the oldest metazoan bioclastic sediments. Geology 41, 507-510. Warren, L.V., Quaglio, F., Riccomini, C., Simões, M.G., Poiré, D.G., Strikis, N.M., 31 Page 31 of 46 Anelli, L.E., Strikis, P.C., 2014. The puzzle assembled: Ediacaran guide fossil Cloudina reveals an old proto-Gondwana seaway. Geology 42, 391-394. ip t Wood, R.A., Grotzinger, J.P., Dickson, J.A.D., 2002. Proterozoic modular biomineralized metazoan from the Nama Group, Namibia. Science 296, cr 2383-2386. us Wood, R.A., 2011. Paleoecology of the earliest skeletal metazoan communities: Implications for early biomineralization. Earth-Science Reviews 106, 184-190. an Xiao, S., Laflamme, M., 2009. On the eve of animal radiation: Phylogeny, ecology and evolution of the Ediacara biota. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 31-40. M Zaine, M.F., Fairchild, T.R., 1985. Comparison of Aulophycus lucianoi Beurlen & Sommer from Ladário (MS) and the genus Cloudina Germs, Ediacaran of te d Namibia. Anais Academia Brasileira de Ciências 57, 130. Zhang, L., 1986. A discovery and preliminary study of the late stage of late Ac ce p Gaojiashan biota from Sinian in Ningqiang County, Shaanxi. Bulletin of the Xi'an Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences 13, 67-88. Zhang, L.Y., Dong, J.S., Tian, S.H., Ding, L.F., 1992. The Gaojiashan biota. In: Ding, L.F., Zhang, L., Li, Y. and Dong, J.S. (Editors), The Study of the Late Sinian–Early Cambrian Biotas from the Northern Margin of the Yangtze Platform. Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House, Beijing, pp. 33-63. Zhao, Y., Wu, M., Peng, J., Yang, X., Yang, R., Yang, Y., 2010. Triridged lobe fossils 32 Page 32 of 46 from the Miaohe biota from the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation from Jiangkou County, Guizhou Province, SW China. Acta Micropalaeontologica ip t Sinica 27, 305-314. Zhuravlev, A.Y., Liñán, E., Vintaned, J.A.G., Debrenne, F., Fedorov, A.B., 2012. New Ac ce p te d M an us and Spain. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57, 205-224. cr finds of skeletal fossils in the terminal Neoproterozoic of the Siberian Platform 33 Page 33 of 46 Figure captions Fig. 1. Stratigraphic column of the Ediacaran Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou ip t section. See fig. 1 of Cai et al. (2014) for location. cr Fig. 2. Schematic diagram showing morphological reconstructions and descriptive us terms of Sinotubulites baimatuoensis (A), S. triangularis (B), S. pentacarinalis an (C), and S. hexagonus (D). Fig. 3. Reflected light photographs of the neotype of Sinotubulites baimatuoensis M from the Dengying Formation in the Yangtze Gorges area. (A–C) Three views of the same specimen showing outer tube wall with transverse corrugations te d (white arrows). (D) Cross section view of the tube (see labeled arrow in A). Note the slightly polygonal shape of the outer wall and the multilayered tube Ac ce p wall. Museum catalog number: GEONWU-BST-006. Fig. 4. Secondary electron microphotographs of Sinotubulites baimatuoensis from the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section. (A) Outer tube wall with segments of denser corrugations (black arrows) interspersed with sparser corrugations (white arrows). (B) Outer tube wall with strongly irregular corrugations. (C) Circular cross-sectional profile. (D) Tube with transverse (black arrows) and slightly oblique (white arrows) corrugations. (E) A 34 Page 34 of 46 fractured tube showing multiple-layered and corrugated outer wall (black double-headed arrow) and smooth inner wall (white double-headed arrow). ip t Note the corrugated outer wall can be pinched inward (white arrow) or outward (black arrow). Also note faint ornaments (arrowheads) on the inner cr wall. Museum catalog numbers: A (GEONWU-LJG01-010), B us (GEONWU-LJGST-2013-1004), C (GEONWU-LJGST-2013-007), D an (GEONWU-LJGST-2013-009), E (GEONWU-LJG01-080). Fig. 5. Secondary electron microphotographs of Sinotubulites triangularis n. sp. from M the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section. (A–B) Slightly curved (A) and straight (B) tubes showing triangular prismatic morphology and regularly te d corrugated outer wall. Note that corrugations are alternately offset across longitudinal ridge in (B). (C) Cross sectional view (see labeled arrow in A). (D) Ac ce p Fractured tube showing multi-layered and corrugated outer wall (arrows). Museum catalog numbers: A (Holotype; GEONWU-LJGTL-2013-0002), B (GEONWU-LJGTL-1-2013-0014), D (GEONWU-LJGTL-1-2013-0015). Fig. 6. Secondary electron microphotographs of Sinotubulites triangularis n. sp. from the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section. (A) A fractured specimen showing smooth inner wall (white double-headed arrow) and corrugated outer wall (black double-headed arrow). (B) Cross sectional view of a tube with 35 Page 35 of 46 outer wall stripped away taphonomically. (C) Close-up view of a multilayered inner wall (white double-headed arrow), surrounded by a thick multilayered ip t outer wall. (D–F) Three different views of a fragmented specimen, showing the interior surface of the corrugated outer wall. Museum catalog numbers: A cr (GEONWU -LJGTL-1-2013-004), B (GEONWU-LJGTL-2013-0016), C an us (GEONWU-LJGTL-2013-002), D–F (GEONWU-LJGTL-1-2013-013). Fig. 7. Secondary electron microphotographs of triradial anabaritids (A–B) and M conularids (C–D) from the early Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Formation at the Shizhonggou section in Ningqiang County of southern Shaanxi Province, te d South China. (A–B) Anabarites trisulcatus, probably an internal mold with helical sulci (black arrows) corresponding to internal keels. Images courtesy of Ac ce p Xin Wang. (C–D) Emeiconularia amplicanalis, with three faces separated by wide longitudinal sulci. Images courtesy of Yunhuan Liu. Note transverse wrinkles (D). Fig. 8. Reflected light photographs (A–C) and secondary electron microphotograph (D) of Sinotubulites pentacarinalis n. sp. from the Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section. (A–B) Two views of the same specimen showing five sides (numbered) of the tube separated by five longitudinal ridges (black dots). Note transverse corrugations (white arrows) and longitudinal ridges (black dots) on 36 Page 36 of 46 the outer wall. Also note smooth inner wall (black arrow in (A). (C) Pentagonal cross-section view (see labeled arrow in A) showing five faces ip t (numbered). Note the more or less circular inner wall and the pentagonal outer wall. Golden color due to Au coating in preparation for SEM observation. (D) cr Close-up view (see labeled rectangle in B) showing that transverse us corrugations (white arrows) are slightly offset across the longitudinal ridge an (black arrows). Museum catalog number: GEONWU-2014-LJG-020. Fig. 9. Reflected light photographs of Sinotubulites hexagonus n. sp. from the M Dengying Formation at the Lijiagou section. (A–C) Three views of the same specimen showing six sides (numbered) of the tube separated by six te d longitudinal ridges (black dots). Note transverse corrugations (white arrows) and longitudinal ridges (black dots) on the outer wall. (D–E) Hexagonal Ac ce p cross-section views (see labeled arrows in A). Note the multilayered tube wall, more or less circular inner wall in (E), and hexagonal outer wall in (D). Museum catalog number: GEONWU-2014-LJG-033. 37 Page 37 of 46 Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Figure 1 Page 38 of 46 Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Figure 2 Page 39 of 46 Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Figure 3 Page 40 of 46 Ac ce pt ed M an us cr i Figure 4 Page 41 of 46 Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Figure 5 Page 42 of 46 Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Figure 6 Page 43 of 46 Ac ce pt ed M an us cr i Figure 7 Page 44 of 46 Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Figure 8 Page 45 of 46 Ac ce p te d M an us cr ip t Figure 9 Page 46 of 46